Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 65 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: multiple mesh models of shell element and result #6398
    parhyang
    Participant

    attached a model input files, thank you for investigate further.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: multiple mesh models of shell element and result #6396
    parhyang
    Participant

    or maybe shell element type being used in default of NextFEM also problematic when mixing, exporting to Tcl shown ShellMITC4 for quad and ShellNLDKGT for tria. Is this possible to select another element type i.e ShellNLDKGQ, ShellDKGQ or ASDShellQ4 for quad and ShellDKG, ASDShellT3 or ShellANDeS for tria?

    in reply to: Axially rigid #6383
    parhyang
    Participant

    hi, this is similar feature i previously ask. Possible trough de-activated Auto in properties and defined input value manually, add column in table menus as multipliers can be useful.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: Frame with beam span loads #6379
    parhyang
    Participant

    hi, i tried split a member manually and shown OOFEM result to be consistent, so i doubt your Etabs results.

    in reply to: Beam spans output results usng OpenSees solver #6375
    parhyang
    Participant

    probably i miss something about improvement, it was available at Options and preferences / Misc / OpenSees output / Interpolate diagrams on beams. However, click Results / More output stations did not display as expected.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: concrete shell reinforcement design (script) #6036
    parhyang
    Participant

    well that’s great for Eurocode users, personally i tried to adapt or extent to conform American building codes.

    in reply to: concrete shell reinforcement design (script) #6033
    parhyang
    Participant

    i’m not yet familiar with NextFEM script language and needed to learn first (probably understandable), detailed of documentation can be found in SAP2000 or Code_Aster. My hand calculation still using oldest one, a newer has more complex due to iteration and shear checking.

    in reply to: concrete shell reinforcement design (script) #6027
    parhyang
    Participant

    hi attached manual hand calculations of concrete shell reinforcement, some verification also provided. Please consider to be implemented due to usefulness, thank you.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: p-delta analysis strange behaviour #5281
    parhyang
    Participant

    hi, let i share experiences of p-delta analysis in NextFEM: large test i took has shown all results in good agreement with another FE software i.e SAP2000/Etabs, Mastan, STAAD, RISA. Only some minor discrepancy is in shear force distribution curve, OOFEM solver can consider shear deformation (Timoshenko) but OpenSees can not.

    in reply to: display maximum beam span moment #5162
    parhyang
    Participant

    actually limit number of stations are available, so many thanks.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: display maximum beam span moment #5160
    parhyang
    Participant

    thanks for explanation, add number of stations may help for this. Maybe in setting option menus, it allows for 10 divisions instead of 20 to make it less dense.

    in reply to: flexural stiffness modification of cracked section #5123
    parhyang
    Participant

    thanks for the hints of work around for element stiffness modification. Maybe, it can be useful when allowed to input as formula, e.g =0.00026667*0.7 to easily remember and modify.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: rigid end offset with OpenSees solver #5121
    parhyang
    Participant

    great news it has been implemented, only in plot results has problem, and it will be fixed in next release. i checked again for OpenSees solver by exclude/deactivated shear deformation and i can confirm also, so many thanks.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: meshing of simple skew plate #5115
    parhyang
    Participant

    thanks for clarification, hopefully there’s improvement in future versions. Meshing of single quadrilateral shell element (arbitrary geometry nodes) by edge division is a common task in structural modeling.

    in reply to: flexural stiffness modification of cracked section #5113
    parhyang
    Participant

    thanks, there’s placed at another menus even it seems not exactly the same. Element stiffness modification of beam or shell element can be assigned independently of axial, flexure, torsion and shear e.g 1.0A, 0.7I, 1.0J, 0.7As

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 65 total)