Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 56 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: is import/export Abaqus INP format available in Lite versions? #4147
    parhyang
    Participant

    i downloaded and testing the features in current version (1.9.1.0). finally it’s working now, so many thanks for support. i want to do some benchmark (even simple ones) for these three solver.

    best wishes,
    sn

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: is import/export Abaqus INP format available in Lite versions? #4142
    parhyang
    Participant

    “please note a loadcase is needed to export to ABAQUS format”

    even i define some load cases, still the behavior is the same as before. on my pc’s the Abaqus input format seems it fails to created.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: is import/export Abaqus INP format available in Lite versions? #4126
    parhyang
    Participant

    attached of example files. it’s contains beam, shell and solid. only one element each type i try.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: is import/export Abaqus INP format available in Lite versions? #4120
    parhyang
    Participant

    thanks for answer regarding to Abaqus import/export features, the problem is the same no mater model type i tried to export (beam, shell or solid) using both Lite and Full versions. INP files created by NextFEM has zero size of files and contains nothing (blank) when opening by text editor.

    fortunately, importing Abaqus file has no issue. also in saving the model were it succeed to open as NextFem file format (nxf)

    in reply to: is import/export Abaqus INP format available in Lite versions? #4118
    parhyang
    Participant

    sorry, i did not read the latest e-shop. it has been separated, thank you

    in reply to: updating to latest versions #3880
    parhyang
    Participant

    previously i make a mistake using ‘send’ button, now it has been used ‘update’ buttons. my mail are active, also in yesterday i recieved an email from ‘info’ account at NextFEM for two times.
    thank you.

    in reply to: updating to latest versions #3878
    parhyang
    Participant

    dear Admin,

    i followng NextFEM Designer since early released, interested in OOFEM/OpenSees solver and the graphical interfaces. so my registered mail become old and invalid, i was updated email as suggested. thank you for concerning & respected user feedback, could benefit to the software itself also.

    and i would like to says sorry, if my discussion contains any missplaced words/grammar cause of english is not my native languages.

    best regards,

    in reply to: updating to latest versions #3868
    parhyang
    Participant

    yes, since new release 1.80 did not work, i always update for every new patch. in hope one of them are work properly, honestly none.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: updating to latest versions #3863
    parhyang
    Participant

    hi, i’m curious. after one night updates with several gigabytes downloaded of my Windows OS. still the problems of DLL did not solved, any hints?

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: updating to latest versions #3861
    parhyang
    Participant

    set to temporary results still not change the conditions, OOFEM solver stoped before load combination cases succesfully run. for an info, i’m running on Win10 64bit (v1803), thanks.

    in reply to: updating to latest versions #3859
    parhyang
    Participant

    hello,
    try removing, cleaning any registry and reinstall did not work for me. remodeling from scratch also lead to similar problems. it seems the error message about trouble in dynamically linked to OOFEM solver were officially distributed in static executable, as another cases in OpenSees solver is work without any issues.
    regards.

    in reply to: updating to latest versions #3853
    parhyang
    Participant

    hi,

    below attached an input files, on my pc: it’s stoped and closed immediatally even the solver log messsage shown finished. thank you for looking.

    best,

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: Floor meshing and boundary beams #3849
    parhyang
    Participant

    hello,

    let i try to understand the feature above, known as physical based modeling. afaik, firstly invented by RISA then followed by many others such as ETABS, STAAD, RAM. can be benefit for designing the member (e.g steel unsupported length) and drafting (2D/3D) purpose. FE meshing and spliting based intersection are in another proccess automatically after physical objet being modeled.

    in reply to: Shell in plane of loads got different results #3713
    parhyang
    Participant

    There’s no large discrepancy in case of out plane force (bending), except in sign conventions. OpenSees solver output graphically reported as reverse sign for moment (area force).

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: how Floor Loads transferring to beams? #3707
    parhyang
    Participant

    Now, it’s working properly for split members. Also, thanks for the hint in compatibility problems of Timoshenko beam element using OpenSees solver. Answering my previous question in strange graphical output cause of large discrepancy between these solver, default’s shear deformation activated makes OpenSees result shown smaller values.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 56 total)