Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
parhyang
ParticipantDear Admin,
Thank you for explanation, the language menus make myself a little bit confuse. Looking an exported tcl files gave me an insight, it’s use equalDOF methods rather than RigidLink (beam) keywords. Differentiation about these two methods are lay on eccentricity being consider or not. A further implementation to switch of both methods in menus could be useful.
Regarding to modeling these condition using offset methods as recommended, still the bending moment due eccentricity being ignore by internal solver (OOFEM) or OpenSees.
Regards,
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.parhyang
Participantseems work only using Oofem solver, but not for Opensees. it will cumbersome with editing manually inside text editor. would it be much better supports? thank for interest
parhyang
Participantso it can not be installed for both versions at the same machine? ok i will try, thank you.
parhyang
Participantusing Lite version 1.20 p5 64bit has no problems in dividing beam/plane element, these problem occurs with the latest version (1.60/64bit). in the beginning it’s work properly for several times, did know why then happen.
parhyang
Participantattached error reports in text format.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.parhyang
Participantthank you, so it’s my pc windows installation problems. i checked again, no error but the model did not change as expected.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.parhyang
Participantthank you for implementation DSS and Spooles in solver options, cut about half in real time consumed.
exiting in user time consumed when solved a plate problems with ~2000 nodes, it’s only required 17sec to solve with DSS compared to 477sec with standard solver.
but why not as in real time consumed?
parhyang
Participanti look back, seem my previous model are wrong. when i try to merging coincided nodes there contains about 400 nodes but why the solver works?
i reproduce the problem, and taking compare OOFEM with CalculiX but still shown large discrepancy in computational times 1,16sec (P6200) vs 149.0sec (i5)
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.parhyang
ParticipantThank you Admin for considering solver times, i believe it’s only a second when solved with CCX. afaik, most opensource FEA solver are well known beat faster compare to commercial solver.
parhyang
Participantthank you for quick responsive, i’m in a basic review of NextFem capabilities. most of codes I use is US such as AISC LRFD and ACI318. just wondering why don’t provide a pages contain e-shop for these each plugin or features.
parhyang
Participantlook quickly I found at load combination features were did not works, are they cost about this and how much?
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.parhyang
Participanti have an issues when installed NextFEM, although Net 4.0 already installed.
error screenshot,
what’s problem? can you explains.
-
AuthorPosts