Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
parhyang
Participantthank you for implementation DSS and Spooles in solver options, cut about half in real time consumed.
exiting in user time consumed when solved a plate problems with ~2000 nodes, it’s only required 17sec to solve with DSS compared to 477sec with standard solver.
but why not as in real time consumed?
parhyang
Participanti look back, seem my previous model are wrong. when i try to merging coincided nodes there contains about 400 nodes but why the solver works?
i reproduce the problem, and taking compare OOFEM with CalculiX but still shown large discrepancy in computational times 1,16sec (P6200) vs 149.0sec (i5)
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.parhyang
ParticipantThank you Admin for considering solver times, i believe it’s only a second when solved with CCX. afaik, most opensource FEA solver are well known beat faster compare to commercial solver.
parhyang
Participantthank you for quick responsive, i’m in a basic review of NextFem capabilities. most of codes I use is US such as AISC LRFD and ACI318. just wondering why don’t provide a pages contain e-shop for these each plugin or features.
parhyang
Participantlook quickly I found at load combination features were did not works, are they cost about this and how much?
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.parhyang
Participanti have an issues when installed NextFEM, although Net 4.0 already installed.
error screenshot,

what’s problem? can you explains.
-
AuthorPosts
